Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas

Oxford University Press (2011)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Divine Premotion.David S. Oderberg - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (3):207-222.
    According to divine premotionism, God does not merely create and sustain the universe. He also moves all secondary causes to action as instruments without undermining their intrinsic causal efficacy. I explain and uphold the premotionist theory, which is the theory of St Thomas Aquinas and his most prominent exponents. I defend the premotionist interpretation of Aquinas in some textual detail, with particular reference to Suarez and to a recent paper by Louis Mancha. Critics, including Molinists and Suarezians, raise various objections (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Introduction.T. Brian Mooney & Mark Nowacki - unknown
    A confluence of scholarly interest has resulted in a revival of Thomistic scholarship across the world. Several areas in the investigation of St. Thomas Aquinas, however, remain under-explored. This volume contributes to two of these neglected areas. First, the volume evaluates the contemporary relevance of St. Thomas's views for the philosophy and practice of education. The second area explored involves the intersections of the Angelic Doctor’s thought and the numerous cultures and intellectual traditions of the East. Contributors to this section (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Prozesstheologie und Panentheismus.Godehard Brüntrup - 2020 - In Godehard Brüntrup, Ludwig Jaskolla & Tobias Müller (eds.), Prozess - Religion - Gott. München, Deutschland: pp. 206 - 228.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reseñas de Libros.Joshua R. Bott, Paulina Morales Aguilera & Victor Paramo Valero - 2016 - Recerca.Revista de Pensament I Anàlisi 18:135-149.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • El error neurocientífico de Descartes, entre Spinoza y Aquinas. El debate entre Damasio y Stump sobre el carácter eliminativo o vitalista del materialismo en la neuroética, neuropolítica y neuroeconomía.Carlos Ortiz de Landázuri - 2016 - Recerca.Revista de Pensament I Anàlisi 18:107-133.
    Se analiza el debate entre Eleonore Stump y Antonio Damasio a propósito de dos posibles estrategias a la hora de superar el “error” neurocientífico del dualismo cartesiano respecto de la correlación entre mente y cerebro, a saber: o bien se corrige el “error” neurocientífico de Descartes desde un modelo híbrido de tipo monista como el de Spinoza que ahora también se utiliza para justificar un materialismo eliminativo aún más radicalizado, a pesar de seguir manteniendo de un modo meramente heurístico las (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark