Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On walk entropies in graphs. Response to Dehmer and Mowshowitz.Ernesto Estrada, José A. de la Peña & Naomichi Hatano - 2016 - Complexity 21 (S1):15-18.
    We provide here irrefutable facts that prove the falsehood of the claims published in [1] by Dehmer and Mowshowitz (DM) against our paper published in [2]. We first prove that Dehmer’s definition of node probability [3] is flawed. In addition, we show that it was not Dehmer in [3] who proposed this definition for the first time. We continue by proving how the use of Dehmer’s definition does not reveal all the physico-mathematical richness of the walk entropy of graphs. Finally, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A case study of cracks in the scientific enterprise: Response to the comments.Matthias Dehmer & Abbe Mowshowitz - 2016 - Complexity 21 (S1):20-22.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Matching energy of unicyclic and bicyclic graphs with a given diameter.Lin Chen, Jinfeng Liu & Yongtang Shi - 2016 - Complexity 21 (2):224-238.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Commentary on Dehmer and Mowshowitz.Michele Benzi & Desmond J. Higham - 2016 - Complexity 21 (S1):19-19.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark