We have structured our response according to five questions arising from the commentaries: (i) What is sentience? (ii) Is sentience a necessary or sufficient condition for moral standing? (iii) What methods should guide comparative cognitive research in general, and specifically in studying invertebrates? (iv) How should we balance scientific uncertainty and moral risk? (v) What practical strategies can help reduce biases and morally dismissive attitudes toward invertebrates?
Page generated Sat Jul 24 14:05:21 2021 on philpapers-web-786f65f869-jmfbq
cache stats: hit=1248, miss=817, save= autohandler : 174 ms called component : 157 ms menu : 102 ms addfields : 6 ms retrieve cache object : 6 ms publicCats : 6 ms save cache object : 0 ms init renderer : 0 ms prepCit : 0 ms setup : 0 ms applytpl : 0 ms auth : 0 ms quotes : 0 ms