Citations of work:

Daniel C. Dennett & Alvin Plantinga (2010). Science and Religion: Are They Compatible?

5 found
Order:
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

Search for work by author name and title
Add directly by record ID

  1.  52
    Theism Reconsidered: Belief in God and the Existence of God.Ilkka Pyysiäinen - 2015 - Zygon 50 (1):138-150.
    This article develops a new perspective on theism that makes the simple juxtaposition of theism and atheism problematic, and helps bridge philosophy of religion and the empirical study of religious phenomena. The basic idea is developed inspired by Terrence Deacon's book Incomplete Nature and its description of “ententional” phenomena, together with some ideas from the cognitive science of religion, especially those related to agency and “theological correctness.” It is argued that God should not be understood as a “homunculus” that stops (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Sexual Diversity and Divine Creation: A Tightrope Walk Between Christianity and Science.Yiftach Fehige - 2013 - Zygon 48 (1):35-59.
    Although modern societies have come to recognize diversity in human sexuality as simply part of nature, many Christian communities and thinkers still have considerable difficulties with related developments in politics, legislation, and science. In fact, homosexuality is a recurrent topic in the transdisciplinary encounter between Christianity and the sciences, an encounter that is otherwise rather “asexual.” I propose that the recent emergence of “Christianity and Science” as an academic field in its own right is an important part of the larger (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  15
    Is Science Compatible with Religion but Not with Naturalism?Hugh Lacey - 2013 - Metascience 22 (2):423-426.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  37
    Religious Naturalism and its Rivals.Mikael Stenmark - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):529-550.
    The aim of this article is to explore where and why religious naturalism differs from its rivals, and also to consider some of the challenges religious naturalism faces. I argue that religious naturalism is best conceived as a reaction against both theists who are religious and naturalists who are atheists: the best option is taken to be a naturalist who is religious. Nevertheless, it is quite difficult to say more exactly what claims the view contains. In fact, it is argued, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  63
    Alvin Plantinga on Paul Draper's Evolutionary Atheology: Implications of Theism's Noncontingency.Tyler Andrew Wunder - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):67-75.
    In his recently published Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, & Naturalism 2011 Alvin Plantinga criticises Paul Draper’s evolutionary argument against theism as part of a larger project to show that evolution poses no threat to Christian belief. Plantinga focuses upon Draper’s probabilistic claim that the facts of evolution are much more probable on naturalism than on theism, and with regard to that claim makes two specific points. First, Draper’s probabilistic claim contradicts theism’s necessary falsehood; unless Draper wishes to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations