Citations of:
Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On
William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.)
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer (2015)
Add citations
You must login to add citations.
|
|
In his late years, Thomas Kuhn became interested in the process of scientific specialization, which does not seem to possess the destructive element that is characteristic of scientific revolutions. It therefore makes sense to investigate whether and how Kuhn’s insights about specialization are consistent with, and actually fit, his model of scientific progress through revolutions. In this paper, I argue that the transition toward a new specialty corresponds to a revolutionary change for the group of scientists involved in such a (...) |