Switch to: References

Citations of:

Bentham: selected writings of John Dinwiddy

Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by William Twining (1989)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Normative Foundations of Unethical Supervision in Organizations.Ali F. Ünal, Danielle E. Warren & Chao C. Chen - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (1):5-19.
    As research in the areas of unethical and ethical leadership grows, we note the need for more consideration of the normative assumptions in the development of constructs. Here, we focus on a subset of this literature, the “dark side” of supervisory behavior. We assert that, in the absence of a normative grounding, scholars have implicitly adopted different intuitive ethical criteria, which has contributed to confusion regarding unethical and ethical supervisory behaviors as well as the proliferation of overlapping terms and fragmentation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • The Bentham Bibliography: Recent Additions: The Bentham Bibliography.P. J. Kelly - 1990 - Utilitas 2 (2):339-344.
  • Bentham and the Development of the British Critique of Colonialism.Peter J. Cain - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (1):1-24.
    This article examines Bentham's contribution to anti-colonial thought in the context of the development of the British radical movement that attacked colonialism on the grounds that it advantaged what Bentham called the at the expense of the . It shows that Bentham was influenced as much by Josiah Tucker and James Anderson as by Adam Smith. Bentham's early economic critique is examined, and the sharp changes in his arguments after 1800 assessed, in the context of the American and French Revolutions (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • La defensa de los derechos inviolables.Juan Antonio Fernández Manzano - 2012 - Astrolabio 13:165-173.
    Partimos de que en sociedades políticas complejas, aun siendo el Estado un artificio necesario para evitar situaciones de dominación, su entramado institucional no está exento de reproducir análogas situaciones a aquellas cuya eliminación justificaba su existencia. Analizaremos desde esta óptica las críticas de Rawls y Nozick al utilitarismo, al que acusan de amparar actuaciones injustas por parte del colectivo hacia los individuos. En concreto, abordaremos el problema de los derechos inviolables desde estas tres líneas de pensamiento para concluir que, a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark