Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Mediators’ Reframing as a Constitutive Element of a Reconciliatory Argumentative Style.Sara Greco & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria - 2021 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (1):73-96.
    This paper shows that reframing of conflict can be considered as a constitutive element of a “reconciliatory argumentative style”, which is typical of dispute mediators, whose aim is to steer parties towards the resolution of their conflict. On the basis of a systematic empirical analysis of mediation cases, we first show that reframing encompasses a change of issue, which may or may not be justified by arguments. Then, we show how it is functional to the three aspects of mediators’ strategic (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Characteristics of a Detached Argumentative Style in Public Policy Analysis.Anca Gâță - 2021 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (1):46-72.
    This study is a contribution to the recently introduced notion of argumentative style in the framework of the pragma-dialectical approach. It aims at characterizing a detached argumentative style, by focusing on a speech event pertaining to the communicative activity type organizational discourse, a report on EU environment and climate change policies. The analysis concerns the executive summary and the key findings of the report, reconstructed in the analysis as the concluding stage of the critical discussion corresponding to the pragma-dialectical model. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Uncompromising Confrontational Argumentative Style of the Spokespersons’ Replies at the Regular Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Wu Peng - 2021 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (1):26-45.
    According to van Eemeren’s expose about the theoretical notion “argumentative style”, each of the four stages of an argumentative exchange in a certain institutional context can have its own argumentative style, but all of them may well belong to the same general category. As the start of a broad project investigating argumentative styles used in the spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this paper focuses on the uncompromising confrontational style prototypically used by (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark