Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Peirce Knew Why Abduction Isn’T IBE—A Scheme and Critical Questions for Abductive Argument.Shiyang Yu & Frank Zenker - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):569-587.
    Whether abduction is treated as an argument or as an inference, the mainstream view presupposes a tight connection between abduction and inference to the best explanation. This paper critically evaluates this link and supports a narrower view on abduction. Our main thesis is that merely the hypothesis-generative aspect, but not the evaluative aspect, is properly abductive in the sense introduced by C. S. Peirce. We show why equating abduction with IBE unnecessarily complicates argument evaluation by levelling the status of abduction (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Empathy, Not Truth: Can a Dialectical and Skeptical Argumentation Enhance Both Democracy and Human Rights Courts?Alberto Puppo - 2018 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 50 (149):89-117.
    Who is the best moral reasoner, the judge or the legislator? The aim of this paper is to refine this question, by distinguishing between different metaethical assumptions. If the meta-ethical assumptions of arguers are incompatible or if their institutional goal is to establish some truth, there is no way of entering in a constructive argumentative activity. My claim is that only when arguers renounce any epistemic temptation and feel empathy with respect to others’ arguments, can institutions improve the quality of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation: Springer, 2017, 2nd Edn, Pp. 363.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (3):307-314.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Context-Dependency of Argumentative Patterns in Discourse.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2017 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 6 (1):3-26.
    This introductory article concludes the examination of prototypical argumentative patterns manifesting themselves in communicative activity types in the political, legal and medical domain reported in this special issue of the Journal of Argumentation in Context and an earlier special issue of the journal Argumentation ). First, the results pertaining to the use of pragmatic argumentation in the main argumentation of prototypical argumentative patterns in the various domains are described that were reported in the latter issue. Next, the results are described (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Identification of Prototypical Argumentative Patterns in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline T. Feteris - 2017 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 6 (1):44-58.
    In this contribution I identify prototypical patterns in the justification of judicial decisions. From a pragma-dialectical perspective, I explain the nature and rationale for the argumentative patterns from the perspective of the institutional function of legal justification and I distinguish different argumentative patterns in clear cases and hard cases in the justification of judicial decisions.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining.Elena Musi & Mark Aakhus - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (3):397-430.
    A macroscope is proposed and tested here for the discovery of the unique argumentative footprint that characterizes how a collective manages differences and pursues disagreement through argument in a polylogue. The macroscope addresses broader analytic problems posed by various conceptualizations of large-scale argument, such as fields, spheres, communities, and institutions. The design incorporates a two-tier methodology for detecting argument patterns of the arguments performed in arguing by an interactive collective that produces views, or topographies, of the ways that issues are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations