Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. El caso Galileo o las Paradojas de una Racionalidad Científica Positivista según Paul Karl Feyerabend.Teresa Gargiulo - 2014 - Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 47:53-88.
    El caso Galileo significó para Feyerabend la oportunidad de mostrar metodológica e históricamente las paradojas y limitaciones de una noción positivista de ciencia. A través de este hecho paradigmático de la ciencia moderna el vienés demuestra las contradicciones que suponen los distintos intentos del neo-positivismo lógico por establecer un criterio de demarcación que defina qué es la ciencia. Da cuenta de cómo aquellos elementos frente a los cuales el positivismo lógico procura delimitar una definición negativa de ciencia, constituyen paradojalmente el (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • La Crítica de Paul Karl Feyerabend Al Modelo Neo-Positivista Del Significado.María Teresa Gargiulo de Vázquez - 2014 - Arbor 190 (769):a168.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Rezensionen.Gerhard Vollmer & Dirk Koppelberg - 1979 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 10 (2):405-416.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft Jahrgang: 21 Heft: 2 Seiten: i-ii.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Against the Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science.Dimitri Ginev - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):191 – 208.
    This paper discusses the tenets of the politics of postmodern philosophy of science. At issue are Rouse's version of naturalism and his reading of Quine's distinction between the indeterminacy of translation and the underdetermination of theories by empirical evidence. I argue that the postmodern approach to science's research practices as patterns of interaction within the world is not in line with the naturalistic account Rouse aims at. I focus also on Rouse's readings of Heidegger's existential conception of science and Kuhn's (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Structuralisme Et Empirisme: L'Approche Ensembliste des Théories Physiques.Jean Leroux - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (1):143-.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Feyerabend ¿un filósofo de la ciencia posmoderno?Teresa Gargiulo - 2017 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 34 (1):203-227.
    El pensamiento de Feyerabend ha sido objeto de múltiples y divergentes interpretaciones. Pero entre ellas parece ser unánime la inscripción de su obra dentro de las coordenadas de una epistemología posmoderna. Estas lecturas podrían encontrar sustento en su anarquismo epistemológico el cual constituye en sí mismo una reducción al absurdo de los intentos del positivismo lógico y del racionalismo crítico por definir axiomática o metodológicamente la ciencia. En este sentido, su obra puede ser entendida, en parte, como una argumentación negativa (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • El Realismo Normativo de Paul Karl Feyerabend y Su Defensa de la Metafísica.María Teresa Gargiulo - 2015 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 23:182-212.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Epistemological Reflections on the Structuralist Philosophy of Science.Peter Hucklenbroich - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (2):279-296.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Falsificationism and the Structure of Theories: The Popper–Kuhn Controversy About the Rationality of Normal Science.Jose Díez - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (3):543-554.
    Many controversies within philosophy of science have been attempted to be explained in terms of the metaphilosophical prescription/description distinction over the goal of philosophy of science. The aim of this paper is to show that the controversy between Popper and Kuhn about the ir/rationality of Normal Science cannot be fully explained in these terms, not even if we also take the truth/problem-solving distinction over the goal of science into account. It is argued that, to gain full understanding of this controversy, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • On the Historical Origins of the Contemporary Notion of Incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend's Assault on Conceptual Conservatism.Eric Oberheim - 2005 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 36 (2):363-90.
    This paper investigates the historical origins of the notion of incommensurability in contemporary philosophy of science. The aim is not to establish claims of priority, but to enhance our understanding of the notion by illuminating the various issues that contributed to its development. Kuhn developed his notion of incommensurability primarily under the influence of Fleck, Polanyi, and Köhler. Feyerabend, who had developed his notion more than a decade earlier, drew directly from Duhem, who had developed a notion of incommensurability in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Book Reviews. [REVIEW]John M. Preston & Alan Soble - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):155-162.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Democracy, Elitism, and Scientific Method.Paul Feyerabend - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):3 – 18.
    Scientific standards cannot be separated from the practice of science and their use presupposes immersion in this practice. The demand to base political action on scientific standards therefore leads to elitism. Democratic relativism, on the other hand, demands equal rights for all traditions or, conversely, a separation between the state and any one of the traditions it contains; for example, it demands the separation of state and science, state and humanitarianism, state and Christianity. Democratic relativism defends the rights of people (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Perception, Illusion, and Hallucination.Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (2):159-191.
    Patrick Suppes'' set-theoretical approach to the analysis of theories, and Joseph D. Sneed''s metatheory are briefly outlined. The notions of observation, illusion and hallucination are reconstructed according to these approaches. It is argued that the terms perception and truth are theoretical with respect to observation but nontheoretical with respect to illusion and hallucination. Hallucination is construed as a special kind of illusion.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Perception, Illusion, and Hallucination.Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh - 1982 - Metamedicine 3 (2):159-191.