Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Peter C. Fishburn.Fred S. Roberts, William V. Gehrlein & Steven J. Brams - 2021 - Theory and Decision 93 (1):1-6.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How to Construct Remainder Sets for Paraconsistent Revisions: Preliminary Report.Rafael Testa, Eduardo Fermé, Marco Garapa & Maurício Reis - 2018 - 17th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NON-MONOTONIC REASONING.
    Revision operation is the consistent expansion of a theory by a new belief-representing sentence. We consider that in a paraconsistent setting this desideratum can be accomplished in at least three distinct ways: the output of a revision operation should be either non-trivial or non-contradictory (in general or relative to the new belief). In this paper those distinctions will be explored in the constructive level by showing how the remainder sets could be refined, capturing the key concepts of paraconsistency in a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Sincerity and Manipulation Under Approval Voting.Ulle Endriss - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):335-355.
    Under approval voting, each voter can nominate as many candidates as she wishes and the election winners are those candidates that are nominated most often. A voter is said to have voted sincerely if she prefers all those candidates she nominated to all other candidates. As there can be a set of winning candidates rather than just a single winner, a voter’s incentives to vote sincerely will depend on what assumptions we are willing to make regarding the principles by which (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Expected Utility Consistent Extensions of Preferences.Burak Can, Bora Erdamar & M. Remzi Sanver - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (2):123-144.
    We consider the problem of extending a (complete) order over a set to its power set. The extension axioms we consider generate orderings over sets according to their expected utilities induced by some assignment of utilities over alternatives and probability distributions over sets. The model we propose gives a general and unified exposition of expected utility consistent extensions whilst it allows to emphasize various subtleties, the effects of which seem to be underestimated – particularly in the literature on strategy-proof social (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Signed Orders in Linear and Nonlinear Utility Theory.Peter C. Fishburn & Irving H. La Valle - 1996 - Theory and Decision 40 (1):79-101.
  • Convex Stochastic Dominance with Finite Consequence Sets.Peter C. Fishburn - 1974 - Theory and Decision 5 (2):119-137.