Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Evidence Based or Person Centered? An Ontological Debate.Rani Lill Anjum - 2016 - European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare 4 (2):421-429.
    Evidence based medicine (EBM) is under critical debate, and person centered healthcare (PCH) has been proposed as an improvement. But is PCH offered as a supplement or as a replacement of EBM? Prima facie PCH only concerns the practice of medicine, while the contended features of EBM also include methods and medical model. I here argue that there are good philosophical reasons to see PCH as a radical alternative to the existing medical paradigm of EBM, since the two seem committed (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Prediction in Epidemiology and Medicine.Jonathan Fuller, Alex Broadbent & Luis J. Flores - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.
  • The Confounding Question of Confounding Causes in Randomized Trials.Jonathan Fuller - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (3):901-926.
    It is sometimes thought that randomized study group allocation is uniquely proficient at producing comparison groups that are evenly balanced for all confounding causes. Philosophers have argued that in real randomized controlled trials this balance assumption typically fails. But is the balance assumption an important ideal? I run a thought experiment, the CONFOUND study, to answer this question. I then suggest a new account of causal inference in ideal and real comparative group studies that helps clarify the roles of confounding (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Translating Trial Results in Clinical Practice: The Risk GP Model.Jonathan Fuller & Luis J. Flores - 2016 - Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research 9:167-168.
  • The Myth and Fallacy of Simple Extrapolation in Medicine.Jonathan Fuller - forthcoming - Synthese:1-21.
    Simple extrapolation is the orthodox approach to extrapolating from clinical trials in evidence-based medicine: extrapolate the relative effect size from the trial unless there is a compelling reason not to do so. I argue that this method relies on a myth and a fallacy. The myth of simple extrapolation is the idea that the relative risk is a ‘golden ratio’ that is usually transportable due to some special mathematical or theoretical property. The fallacy of simple extrapolation is an unjustified argument (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Clinical Judgement in the Era of Big Data and Predictive Analytics.Benjamin Chin-Yee & Ross Upshur - 2018 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24 (3):638-645.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Interpreting Risk as Evidence of Causality: Lessons Learned From a Legal Case to Determine Medical Malpractice.Mathew Mercuri & Brian S. Baigrie - 2016 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22 (4):515-521.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Clinical Judgement in Precision Medicine.Mark R. Tonelli - 2018 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24 (3):646-648.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation