Citations of work:

Giles R. Scofield, John C. Fletcher, Albert R. Jonsen, Christian Lilje, Donnie J. Self & Judith Wilson Ross (1993). Ethics Consultation: The Least Dangerous Profession?

12 found
Order:
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

Search for work by author name and title
Add directly by record ID

  1. Whose Harm? Which Metaphysic?Abram Brummett - forthcoming - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics:1-19.
    Douglas Diekema has argued that it is not the best interest standard, but the harm principle that serves as the moral basis for ethicists, clinicians, and the courts to trigger state intervention to limit parental authority in the clinic. Diekema claims the harm principle is especially effective in justifying state intervention in cases of religiously motivated medical neglect in pediatrics involving Jehovah’s Witnesses and Christian Scientists. I argue that Diekema has not articulated a harm principle that is capable of justifying (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  14
    Using Dreyfus’ Legacy to Understand Justice in Algorithm-Based Processes.David Casacuberta & Ariel Guersenzvaig - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-7.
    As AI is linked to more and more aspects of our lives, the need for algorithms that can take decisions that are not only accurate but also fair becomes apparent. It can be seen both in discussions of future trends such as autonomous vehicles or the issue of superintelligence, as well as actual implementations of machine learning used to decide whether a person should be admitted in certain university or will be able to return a credit. In this paper, we (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  4
    Two Troubling Trends in the Conversation Over Whether Clinical Ethics Consultants Have Ethics Expertise.Abram Brummett & Christopher J. Ostertag - 2018 - HEC Forum 30 (2):157-169.
    In a recent issue of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, several scholars wrote on the topic of ethics expertise in clinical ethics consultation. The articles in this issue exemplified what we consider to be two troubling trends in the quest to articulate a unique expertise for clinical ethicists. The first trend, exemplified in the work of Lisa Rasmussen, is an attempt to define a role for clinical ethicists that denies they have ethics expertise. Rasmussen cites the dependence of ethical (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  19
    Ethics Consultation Volume at U.S. Children's Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Survey.George E. Hardart & Mindy Lipson - 2016 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 7 (1):64-70.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  25
    Erratum To: The Ethics of 'Public Understanding of Ethics'—Why and How Bioethics Expertise Should Include Public and Patients' Voices.Silke Schicktanz, Mark Schweda & Brian Wynne - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):251-251.
    “Ethics” is used as a label for a new kind of expertise in the field of science and technology. At the same time, it is not clear what ethical expertise consists in and what its political status in modern democracies can be. Starting from the “participatory turn” in recent social research and policy, we will argue that bioethical reasoning has to include public views of and attitudes towards biomedicine. We will sketch the outlines of a bioethical conception of “public understanding (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  6.  7
    The Ethics of ‘Public Understanding of Ethics’—Why and How Bioethics Expertise Should Include Public and Patients’ Voices.Silke Schicktanz, Mark Schweda & Brian Wynne - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):129-139.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  7.  23
    What Is Medical Ethics Consultation?Giles R. Scofield - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (1):95-118.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  8.  3
    What is Medical Ethics Consultation?Giles R. Scofield - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (1):95-118.
  9.  43
    A New Rejection of Moral Expertise.Christopher Cowley - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (3):273-279.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  10. What Kind of Doing is Clinical Ethics?George J. Agich - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
    This paper discusses the importance of Richard M. Zaners work on clinical ethics for answering the question: what kind of doing is ethics consultation? The paper argues first, that four common approaches to clinical ethics – applied ethics, casuistry, principlism, and conflict resolution – cannot adequately address the nature of the activity that makes up clinical ethics; second, that understanding the practical character of clinical ethics is critically important for the field; and third, that the practice of clinical ethics is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  11.  22
    Strange, but Not Stranger: The Peculiar Visage of Philosophy in Clinical Ethics Consultation. [REVIEW]Mark J. Bliton & Stuart G. Finder - 1999 - Human Studies 22 (1):69-97.
    Baylis, Tomlinson, and Hoffmaster each raise a number of critiques in response to Bliton's manuscript. In response, we focus on three themes we believe run through each of their critiques. The first is the ambiguity between the role of ethics consultation within an institution and the role of the actual ethics consultant in a particular situation, as well as the resulting confusion when these roles are conflated. We explore this theme by revisiting the question of What's going on? in clinical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  12.  25
    Revitalizing a Hospital Ethics Committee.Henry J. Silverman - 1994 - HEC Forum 6 (4):189-222.