Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On Failing to Assert: Reply to David Sherry.Laurence Goldstein - 2004 - Philosophia 31 (3-4):579-588.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Wittgenstein on Rule Following: A Critical and Comparative Study of Saul Kripke, John McDowell, Peter Winch, and Cora Diamond.Samuel Weir - 2003 - Dissertation, King's College London
    This thesis is a critical and comparative study of four commentators on the later Wittgenstein’s rule following considerations. As such its primary aim is exegetical, and ultimately the thesis seeks to arrive at an enriched understanding of Wittgenstein’s work through the distillation of the four commentators into what, it is hoped, can be said to approach a definitive interpretation, freed of their individual frailties. -/- The thesis commences by explicating the position of Kripke’s Wittgenstein. He draws our attention to the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Wittgensteinian Approach to Rationality in Argumentation.Menashe Schwed - unknown
    The central supposition of the sceptical controversy regarding rationality in the theory of argumentation is that either there are universal standards against which the reasonableness of arguments can be evaluate or, conversely, that there are no determinate standards against which arguments can be evaluated, and hence no methods by which disputes can be rationally resolved. The paper argues that the basic terms of this debate are erroneously defined and that there is a middle path in this sceptical controversy. The paper (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Unity of Language and Logic in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Leo K. C. Cheung - 2006 - Philosophical Investigations 29 (1):22–50.
  • On Wittgenstein's Notion of Meaning-Blindness: Its Subjective, Objective and Aesthetic Aspects.Christian Helmut Wenzel - 2010 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (3):201-219.
    Wittgenstein in his later years thought about experiences of meaning and aspect change. Do such experiences matter? Or would a meaning- or aspect-blind person not lose much? Moreover, is this a matter of aesthetics or epistemology? To get a better perspective on these matters, I will introduce distinctions between certain subjective and objective aspects, namely feelings of our inner psychological states versus fine-tuned objective experiences of the outer world. It seems to me that in his discussion of meaning-blindness, Wittgenstein unhappily (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On a so‐Called Solution to a Paradox.Michael Veber - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):283-297.
    The mooronic solution to the surprise quiz paradox says students know there will be a surprise quiz one day this week but they lose this knowledge on the penultimate day. This is because ‘there will be a surprise quiz one day this week’ then becomes an instance of Moore's paradox. This view has surprising consequences. Furthermore, even though the surprise quiz announcement becomes an instance of Moore's paradox on the penultimate day, this does not prevent the students from knowing the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation