Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Clarifying How to Deploy the Public Interest Criterion in Consent Waivers for Health Data and Tissue Research.G. Owen Schaefer, Graeme Laurie, Sumytra Menon, Alastair V. Campbell & Teck Chuan Voo - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-10.
    Background Several jurisdictions, including Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and most recently Ireland, have a public interest or public good criterion for granting waivers of consent in biomedical research using secondary health data or tissue. However, the concept of the public interest is not well defined in this context, which creates difficulties for institutions, institutional review boards and regulators trying to implement the criterion. Main text This paper clarifies how the public interest criterion can be defensibly deployed. We first explain the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Consenting for Current Genetic Research: Views of Canadian Institutional Review Board Members.Iris Jaitovich Groisman & Beatrice Godard - 2015 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 6 (4).
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  • More Nuanced Informed Consent Is Not Necessarily Better Informed Consent.Danielle Hornstein, Sharon Nakar, Sara Weinberger & Dov Greenbaum - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):51-53.
  • Broad Consent Is Consent for Governance.Sarah N. Boers, Johannes J. M. van Delden & Annelien L. Bredenoord - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):53-55.
  • Should Epidemiological Studies Be Subject to Ethics Review?Jan Piasecki, Vilius Dranseika & Marcin Waligora - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (2):213-220.
    Epidemiological studies usually do not pose high risk to participants. At the same time they provide valuable knowledge and improve public and individual health. In many countries, studies involving human subjects are subject to ethics review. Research shows that the process of obtaining ethical approval from institutional research boards or research ethics committees is sometimes costly, time-consuming and seriously delays important research projects. In this article we consider arguments against and in favor of ethics review of epidemiological studies. On the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Crushing Consent Under the Weight of Expectations.Jeffrey R. Botkin - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):47-49.
  • Data and Tissue Research Without Patient Consent: A Qualitative Study of the Views of Research Ethics Committees in New Zealand.Angela Ballantyne & Andrew Moore - 2018 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):143-153.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations