Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Schopenhauer and Non-Cognitivist Moral Realism.Colin Marshall - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (2):293-316.
    I argue that Schopenhauer’s views on the foundations of morality challenge the widely-held belief that moral realism requires cognitivism about moral judgments. Schopenhauer’s core metaethical view consists of two claims: that moral worth is attributed to actions based in compassion, and that compassion, in contrast to egoism, arises from deep metaphysical insight into the non-distinctness of beings. These claims, I argue, are sufficient for moral realism, but are compatible with either cognitivism or non-cognitivism. While Schopenhauer’s views of moral judgment are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Piruetas entre la trascendencia y la inmanencia: notas acerca de la ética del «primer» Wittgenstein.Miguel Angel Quintana Paz - 2006 - In Ildefonso Murillo Murillo (ed.), Religión y persona. Colmenar Viejo (Madrid): Ediciones Diálogo Filosófico. pp. 793-805.
    Si decidiésemos clasificar las teorías éticas en “inmanentistas” (aquellas que cifran lo éticamente aceptable en algún tipo de eventos del mundo, como por ejemplo el crecimiento utilitarista del beneficio general) y “trascendentalistas” (aquellas que ubican en algún espacio más allá de este mundo y esta vida el motivo de por qué comportarnos éticamente –por ejemplo, debido a alguna suerte de recompensa ultraterrena–), entonces el pensamiento moral del llamado “primer” Wittgenstein ocuparía un lugar especial entre ambos extremos de tal dicotomía. En (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Schopenhauers Gebrauchstheorie der Bedeutung und das Kontextprinzip: Eine Parallele zu Wittgensteins ›Philosophischen Untersuchungen‹.Jens Lemanski - 2016 - Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 2016 (97):171-195.
    In previous research, Schopenhauer is regarded as a consistent representative of a classical picture theory of language. The paper shows, however, that Schopenhauer does not only present a use theory of meaning in his lectures on logic, but also justifies it with the help of the context principle. Furthermore, it is discussed to what extent Schopenhauer's use theory of meaning is similar to the semantic theory of Ludwig Wittgenstein and his successors.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Wittgenstein, Kant, Schopenhauer, and Critical Philosophy.Julian Young - 1984 - Theoria 50 (2-3):73-105.