Zucker J. I.. The adequacy problem for classical logic. Journal of philosophical logic, vol. 7 , pp. 517–535.Zucker J. I. and Tragesser R. S.. The adequacy problem for inferential logic. Journal of philosophical logic, pp. 501–516.Prawitz Dag. Proofs and the meaning and completeness of the logical constants. Essays on mathematical and philosophical logic, Proceedings of the Fourth Scandinavian Logic Symposium and of the First Soviet-Finnish Logic Conference, Jyväskyla, Finland, June 29-July 6,1976, edited by Hintikka Jaakko, Niiniluoto Ilkka, and Saarinen Esa, Synthese library, vol. 122, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Boston, and London, 1979, pp. 25–40.Prawitz Dag. Meaning and proofs: on the conflict between classical and intuitionistic logic. Theoria, vol. 43 , pp. 2–40.Dummett M. A. E.. The justification of deduction. Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 59 , pp. 201–232.Dummett Michael. The philosophical basis of intuitionistic logic. Logic Colloquium '73, Proceedings [Book Review]
Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (3):689-694 (1982)
Add citationsYou must login to add citations.
Dummett's case against platonism rests on arguments concerning the acquisition and manifestation of knowledge of meaning. Dummett's arguments are here criticized from a viewpoint less Davidsonian than Chomskian. Dummett's case against formalism is obscure because in its prescriptive considerations are not clearly separated from descriptive. Dummett's implicit value judgments are here made explicit and questioned. ?Combat Revisionism!? Chairman Mao.