Switch to: References

Citations of:

Plato's Theory of Knowledge

Greenwood Press (1962)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Case of Theaetetus.Gokhan Adalier - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (1):1-37.
    Any comprehensive interpretation of the "Theaetetus" has to provide answers to, among others, two very general questions concerning that dialogue: "What is Plato's relation to the problems faced in the "Theaetetus"?" and "What is the significance of the absence of the Forms from the discussion of the "Theaetetus", given their undoubted relevance to the topic of the dialogue, i.e. knowledge?" Predominantly, the answer given to the first question in the literature has been that the problems are those that Plato is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Being and Becoming and the Immanence-Transcendence Relation in Evelyn Underhill’s Mystical Philosophy.Peter Gan Chong Beng - 2011 - Sophia 50 (3):375-389.
    If mysticism, as Coventry Patmore defines it, is 'the science of ultimates,' in what way would mysticism explain the possibility of a profound relationship between ultimate reality as infinite and proximate reality as finite ? This paper attempts to address that question through the lens of Evelyn Underhill’s philosophy of mysticism. The paper fundamentally works at framing two of Hegel’s triadic patterns of dialectic against the being-becoming binary as engaged by Underhill. This application helps unveil the relation of transcendence with (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On Essences in the Cratylus.F. C. White - 1978 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):259-274.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Essence and Existence in Plato and Aristotle.M. J. Cresswell - 1971 - Theoria 37 (2):91-113.
    Truth of x (independently of any description of x) that it is f. A property f which holds of x but is not per se of x is said to hold per accidens of x. The essence of an individual is the sum of its per se properties. We can formulate the following: doctrine a: concrete individuals do not have essences though abstract entities do. Doctrine b: concrete individuals have essences but they do not individuate, whereas abstract entities have essences (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Anamnesis in the Meno: Part One: The Data of the Theory.Gregory Vlastos - 1965 - Dialogue 4 (2):143-167.
  • The Scope of Knowledge in Republic V.F. C. White - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (4):339 – 354.