Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The 'must' and the 'heptahedron': Remarks on remarks.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2003 - Theoria 18 (2):199-206.
    I offer some brief remarks in reply to comments and criticisms of my earlier work on logical consequence and logical constants. I concentrate on criticisms, especially García-Carpintero’s charge that myviews make no room for modal intuitions about logical consequence, and Sher’s attempted rebuttal of my critique of her theory of logical constants. I show that García-Carpintero’s charge is based on misunderstandings, and that Sher’s attempted rebuttal actually reveals new problems for her theory.
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Evaluating Etchemendy's Critiques of Tarski’s Analysis of Logical Consequence.Hamid Alaeinejad & Morteza Hajhosseini - 2022 - Philosophical Investigations 16 (38):505-532.
    According to Tarski's model-theoretic analysis of logical consequence, the sentence X is a logical consequence of a set of sentences Γ if and only if any model for Γ is also a model for X. Etchemendy, however, does not accept the analysis and critiques it. According to Etchemendy, Tarski’s analysis 1- involves a conceptual mistake: confusing the symptoms of logical consequence with their cause; 2- cannot properly explain the necessity of logical consequence; 3- faces the problem of overgeneration; and 4- (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation