Switch to: References

Citations of:

Thoughts and holism: Reply to Cohen

Analysis 59 (2):71-78 (1999)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Functional role semantics and reflective equilibrium.Simone Gozzano - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (38):62-76.
    In this paper it is argued that functional role semantics can be saved from criticisms, such as those raised by Putnam and Fodor and Lepore, by indicating which beliefs and inferences are more constitutive in determining mental content. The Scylla is not to use vague expressions; the Charybdis is not to endorse the analytic/synthetic distinction. The core idea is to use reflective equilibrium as a strategy to pinpoint which are the beliefs and the inferences that constitute the content of a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Gonseth and Quine.Michael Esfeld - 2001 - Dialectica 55 (3):199–219.
    This paper compares the four principles of Gonseth’s epistemology with Quine’s “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. It is shown how Gonseth’s epistemology avoids the main objections to Quine’s holism. On this basis, the relevance of Gonseth’s epistemology for today’s discussion is assessed.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Gonseth and Quine.Michael Esfeld - 2001 - Dialectica 55 (3):199-219.
    This paper compares the four principles of Gonseth's epistemology with Quine's “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. It is shown how Gonseth's epistemology avoids the main objections to Quine's holism. On this basis, the relevance of Gonseth's epistemology for today's discussion is assessed.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Holism, thought, and the fate of metaphysics: counter-reply to Heal.J. Cohen - 1999 - Analysis 59 (2):79-85.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The value of thinking and the normativity of logic.Manish Oza - 2020 - Philosophers' Imprint 20 (25):1-23.
    (1) This paper is about how to build an account of the normativity of logic around the claim that logic is constitutive of thinking. I take the claim that logic is constitutive of thinking to mean that representational activity must tend to conform to logic to count as thinking. (2) I develop a natural line of thought about how to develop the constitutive position into an account of logical normativity by drawing on constitutivism in metaethics. (3) I argue that, while (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations