Citations of work:

Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Bert Gordijn & Martien Pijnenburg (2006). Does an Appeal to the Common Good Justify Individual Sacrifices for Genomic Research?

Order:
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

Search for work by author name and title
Add directly by record ID

  1.  36
    Biobanking Research on Oncological Residual Material: A Framework Between the Rights of the Individual and the Interest of Society. [REVIEW]Luciana Caenazzo, Pamela Tozzo & Renzo Pegoraro - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):17.
    The tissue biobanking of specific biological residual materials, which constitutes a useful resource for medical/scientific research, has raised some ethical issues, such as the need to define which kind of consent is applicable for biological residual materials biobanks.
    Direct download (16 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  59
    The Concepts of Common Good and Public Interest: From Plato to Biobanking.Kadri Simm - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):554-562.
    The expression “common good” usually conjures up benevolent associations: it is something to be desired, a worthy goal, and it would be a brave person who declared he or she was against the common good. Yet modern times have taught us to be critical and even suspicious of such grand rhetoric, leading us to query what lies behind this ambitious notion, who formulates what it stands for, and how such formulations have been reached.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  58
    Changing Ethical Frameworks: From Individual Rights to the Common Good?Margit Sutrop - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):533-545.
    Whereas in the 1970s early bioethicists believed that bioethics is an arena for the application of philosophical theories of utilitarianism, deontology, and natural law thinking, contemporary policy-oriented bioethicists seem rather to be keen on framing ethical issues through political ideologies. Bioethicists today are often labeled “liberal” or “communitarian,” referring to their different understandings of the relationship between the individual and society. Liberal individualism, with its conceptual base of autonomy, dignity, and privacy, enjoyed a long period of dominance in bioethics, but (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations