Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Influence of Regulation on Trust and Risk Preference in Sharing Communities.Sarah Marth, Thomas Sabitzer, Eva Hofmann, Barbara Hartl & Elfriede Penz - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Sharing within communities has gained popularity in recent years. However, taking part in a community also comes with a certain amount of risk. This perceived amount of risk can be contained by regulations within a community as well as by potential participants’ trust in the community and the other members. We argue for a relation between regulation and the willingness to take the risk of joining a sharing community with trust as mediator. Thereby, we distinguish between two kinds of regulation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Relationship Between Austrian Tax Auditors and Self-Employed Taxpayers: Evidence From a Qualitative Study.Katharina Gangl, Barbara Hartl, Eva Hofmann & Erich Kirchler - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    The relationship between tax authorities and taxpayers is essential for tax compliance. The aim of the present paper was to explore systematically the determinants of this relationship and related tax compliance behaviors based on the extended slippery slope framework. We used in-depth qualitative interviews with 33 self-employed taxpayers and 30 tax auditors. Interviewees described the tax relationship along the extended slippery slope framework concepts of power and trust. However, also novel sub-categories of power (e.g., setting deadlines) and trust (e.g., personal (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Association Between Vertical Equity and Presidential Voting Behavior and Taxpayers’ Compliance.Jonathan Farrar, Dawn W. Massey, Errol Osecki & Linda Thorne - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 172 (1):101-114.
    Since taking office, the President of the United States has consistently refused to make his tax returns available for public scrutiny. In so doing, he has broken with presidential tradition and kept people guessing about what his tax returns would show if they were disclosed. Interestingly enough, in the absence of concrete knowledge about the President’s tax circumstances, some taxpayers perceive that he did not pay his fair share and others perceive that he did. This situation presents an opportunity for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark