Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Defaults with Priorities.John Horty - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (4):367-413.
  • Moral Particularism in the Light of Deontic Logic.Xavier Parent - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):75-98.
    The aim of this paper is to strengthen the point made by Horty about the relationship between reason holism and moral particularism. In the literature prima facie obligations have been considered as the only source of reason holism. I strengthen Horty’s point in two ways. First, I show that contrary-to-duties provide another independent support for reason holism. Next I outline a formal theory that is able to capture these two sources of holism. While in simple settings the proposed account coincides (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Arguing About Constitutive and Regulative Norms.Gabriella Pigozzi & Leendert van der Torre - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):189-217.
    Formal arguments are often represented by pairs, but in this paper we consider normative arguments represented by sequences of triples, where constitutive norms derive institutional facts from brute facts, and regulative norms derive deontic facts like obligations and permissions from institutional facts. The institutional facts may be seen as the reasons explaining or warranting the deontic obligations and permissions, and therefore they can be attacked by other normative arguments too. We represent different aspects of normative reasoning by different kinds of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Remedial Interchange, Contrary-to-Duty Obligation and Commutation.Xavier Parent - 2003 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13 (3-4):345-375.
    This paper discusses the relation between deontic logic and the study of conversational interactions. Special attention is given to the notion of remedial interchange as analysed by sociologists and linguistic pragmaticians. This notion is close to the one of contrary-to-duty obligation, which deontic logicians have been studying in its own right. The present article also investigates the question of whether some of the aspects of conversational interactions can fruitfully be described by using formal tools originally developed in the study of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reinstatement, Floating Conclusions, and the Credulity of Mental Model Reasoning.Jean-Franĉois Bonnefon - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (4):621-631.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Argumentos Máximamente Específicos En Argumentación Rebatible.Cláudio Andrés Alessio - 2016 - Manuscrito 39 (2):5-58.
    Resumen DeLP is a defeasible argumentation system that captures common sense reasoning features. Examples proposed in the literature show that DeLP gets counterintuitive results. We suggest a possible cause of this problem and we propose an approach to neutralize it. The approach is based on the pre-selection criterion of arguments, called maximal specificity. The criterion establishes that an argument will be considered like maximally specific only if, for every argument based on more specific evidence which does not explain the same (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark