Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Paul Draper, Agnosticism and the Problem of Evil.Nesim Aslantatar - 2022 - Dini Araştırmalar 25 (62):173-196.
    The problem of evil is generally taken as evidence for atheism. However, some philosophers can be referred as a sign that this is not necessarily so. For example, one of the leading philosophers of contemporary philosophy of religion, Paul Draper, for whom one can say that the problem of evil is a big problem by looking into the works he brought to the literature, defines himself as an agnostic. Draper does not argue that evil directly supports or justifies agnosticism, but (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • If We Can’t Tell What Theism Predicts, We Can’t Tell Whether God Exists: Skeptical Theism and Bayesian Arguments from Evil.Nevin Climenhaga - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion.
    According to a simple Bayesian argument from evil, the evil we observe is less likely given theism than given atheism, and therefore lowers the probability of theism. I consider the most common skeptical theist response to this argument, according to which our cognitive limitations make the probability of evil given theism inscrutable. I argue that if skeptical theists are right about this, then the probability of theism given evil is itself largely inscrutable, and that if this is so, we ought (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Hume Literature, 1995.William E. Morris - 1996 - Hume Studies 22 (2):387-400.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•