Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Engelhardt on the Common Morality in Bioethics.Ana S. Iltis - 2018 - Conatus 3 (2):49.
    Contemporary bioethics is, at least in part, the product of biomedical and sociopolitical changes in the middle to latter part of the 20th century. These changes prompted reflection on deep moral questions at a time when traditional sources of moral guidance no longer were widely respected and, in some cases, were being rejected. In light of this, scholars, policy makers, and clinicians sought to identify a common morality that could be used among persons with different moral commitments to resolve disputes (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Acquiescence is Not Agreement: The Problem of Marginalization in Pediatric Decision Making.Amy E. Caruso Brown - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-19.
    Although parents are the default legal surrogate decision-makers for minor children in the U.S., shared decision making in a pluralistic society is often much more complicated, involving not just p...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Re-Thinking the Role of the Family in Medical Decision-Making.Mark J. Cherry - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (4):451-472.
    This paper challenges the foundational claim that the human family is no more than a social construction. It advances the position that the family is a central category of experience, being, and knowledge. Throughout, the analysis argues for the centrality of the family for human flourishing and, consequently, for the importance of sustaining family-oriented practices within social policy, such as more family-oriented approaches to consent to medical treatment. Where individually oriented approaches to medical decision-making accent an ethos of isolated personal (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Familial Authority and Christian Bioethics--A Geography of Moral and Social Controversies.M. J. Cherry - 2011 - Christian Bioethics 17 (3):185-205.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Best Interests or Harm to Reverse Parental Decisions: Each in Its Own Domain.Allan J. Jacobs - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):41-44.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Medical Decision Making and the Family: An Examination of Controversies.M. Wang, P. -C. Lo & R. Fan - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):493-498.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Mature Minor: Some Critical Psychological Reflections on the Empirical Bases.B. C. Partridge - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (3):283-299.
    Moral and legal notions engaged in clinical ethics should not only possess analytic clarity but a sound basis in empirical findings. The latter condition brings into question the expansion of the mature minor exception. The mature minor exception in the healthcare law of the United States has served to enable those under the legal age to consent to medical treatment. Although originally developed primarily for minors in emergency or quasi-emergency need for health care, it was expanded especially from the 1970s (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations