Switch to: References

Citations of:

Is Coherentism Coherent?

Analysis 67 (4):341 - 344 (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Refutation of Foundationalism?Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2007 - Analysis 67 (4):345-346.
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Thoughts, Oughts and the Conceptual Primacy of Belief.Alexander Miller - 2008 - Analysis 68 (3):234-238.
  • A Refutation of Foundationalism?Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2007 - Analysis 67 (4):345–346.
  • A Case of Confusing Probability and Confirmation.Jeanne Peijnenburg - 2012 - Synthese 184 (1):101-107.
    Tom Stoneham put forward an argument purporting to show that coherentists are, under certain conditions, committed to the conjunction fallacy. Stoneham considers this argument a reductio ad absurdum of any coherence theory of justification. I argue that Stoneham neglects the distinction between degrees of confirmation and degrees of probability. Once the distinction is in place, it becomes clear that no conjunction fallacy has been committed.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Coherentism and the Symmetry of Epistemic Support.Nicholas Shackel - 2008 - Analysis 68 (299):226-234.
    In this paper I prove that holistic coherentism is logically equivalent to the conjunction of symmetry and quasi-transitivity of epistemic support and a condition on justified beliefs. On the way I defend Tom Stoneham from a criticism made by Darrell Rowbottom and prove a premiss of Stoneham’s argument to be an entailment of coherentism.
    Direct download (11 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation