Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Statement in Support of Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act and in Opposition to a Proposed Revision.D. Alan Shewmon - forthcoming - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy:jhab014.
    Discrepancies between the Uniform Determination of Death Act and the adult and pediatric diagnostic guidelines for brain death have motivated proposals to revise the UDDA. A revision proposed by Lewis, Bonnie and Pope, has received particular attention, the three novelties of which would be: to specify the Guidelines as the legally recognized “medical standard,” to exclude hypothalamic function from the category of “brain function,” and to authorize physicians to conduct an apnea test without consent and even over a proxy’s objection. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries “Rethinking the Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Foundations of Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making for Brain Death Determination”.Jeremy R. Garrett & Ivor Berkowitz - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):W1-W5.
    Volume 20, Issue 6, June 2020, Page W1-W5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Brain Death Testing: Time for National Uniformity.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):1-3.
    Volume 20, Issue 6, June 2020, Page 1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark