Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Frank H. Knight le risque comme critique de l'économie politique.Pierre-Charles Pradier & David Teira Serrano - 2000 - Revue de Synthèse 121 (1-2):79-116.
    Nous proposons dans cet article de rechercher chez les prédécesseurs de Frank Knight un peu de lumière pour éclairer sa distinction entrerisque etincertitude. D'une part, la lecture des économistes qui l'ont précédé permet de comprendre sa situation dans lapolémique sur la répartition. D'autre part, l'examen des sources philosophiques qui informent sa théorie de la connaissance conduit à analyser l'opposition risque/incertitude comme une opposition théorie de la probabilité/théorie de la connaissance (imparfaite). Le recours à l'épistémologie de Knight fait saisir en quoi (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Theory of Business Eunomics: The Means–Ends Relation in Business Ethics.Åsbjørn Melkevik - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 160 (1):293-305.
    This article indicates a new direction for business ethics, which Lon Fuller pioneered with his work on social architecture. “Eunomics”, as Fuller called it, is “the theory or study of good order and workable arrangements”. How should we appraise the effects of the various ways of organizing and running a corporation, for example, with regard to the different structures and basic plans it can espouse? We should reject the “doctrine of the infinite pliability of social arrangements”, as some forms of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Freedom in organizations.Michael Keeley - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (4):249 - 263.
    Organizations in competitive markets are often assumed to be voluntary associations, involving free exchange between various participants for mutual benefit. Just how voluntary or free organizational exchanges really are, however, is problematic. Even the criteria for determining whether specific transactions are free or coerced are not clear. In this paper, I review three general approaches to specifying such criteria: consequentialist, descriptive, and normative. I argue that the last is the most reasonable, that freedom is an essentially moral concept, whose meaning (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation