Switch to: References

Citations of:

Liberalism’s Religion

Harvard University Press (2017)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Disaggregating the Creationist Challenge to Liberal Neutrality.Cristóbal Bellolio - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 54 (1):62-80.
    Journal of Philosophy of Education, EarlyView.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Integrity of Religious Believers.Paul Bou-Habib - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (1):1-13.
    According to Cécile Laborde, persons with religious commitments that are incidentally burdened by generally applicable laws should, under certain circumstances, be provided with an exemption from those laws. Labore’s justification for this view is that religious commitments are a type of commitment with which a person must comply if she is to maintain her integrity. I argue that Laborde´s account is insufficiently demanding in terms of the other-regarding attitudes it expects people to have before they can make claims to exemptions (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Religious Accommodation and Disproportionate Burden.Alan Patten - forthcoming - Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-14.
    The paper offers a critical engagement with Cécile Laborde’s book, Liberalism’s Religion. It elaborates several objections to Laborde’s account of religious accommodations, and sketches an alternative approach.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pluralistic Partisanship.Kevin Vallier - 2019 - Res Publica 25 (4):487-496.
    This essay explores and criticizes Matteo Bonotti’s argument that parties and partisans in a publicly justified polity should appeal primarily, if not exclusively, to accessible justificatory reasons to fulfill their political duties. I argue that political parties should only support coercive policies if they rationally believe that the coercive law or policy in question can be publicly justified to those subject to the law or policy in terms of their own private—specifically intelligible—reasons. I then explore four practical differences between our (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Moderate Inclusivism and the Conversational Translation Proviso: Revising Habermas' Ethics of Citizenship.Jonas Jakobsen - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (4):87.
    Habermas’ ‘ethics of citizenship’ raises a number of relevant concerns about the dangers of a secularistic exclusion of religious contributions to public deliberation, on the one hand, and the dangers of religious conflict and sectarianism in politics, on the other. Agreeing largely with these concerns, the paper identities four problems with Habermas’ approach, and attempts to overcome them: the full exclusion of religious reasons from parliamentary debate; the full inclusion of religious reasons in the informal public sphere; the philosophical distinction (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is Epistemic Accessibility Enough? Same-Sex Marriage, Tradition, and the Bible.Aurélia Bardon - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (1):21-35.
  • Introduction: Laborde, Liberalism, and Religion.Aurélia Bardon & Jeffrey W. Howard - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-8.
  • OnLiberalism’s Religion.Jean L. Cohen - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-20.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Defending Broad Neutrality.Jeffrey W. Howard - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (1):36-47.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Liberalism and Religion: The Plural Grounds of Separation.Chiara Cordelli - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (1):68-80.
  • Three Cheers for Liberal Modesty.Cécile Laborde - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-17.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Laborde’s Religion.Sune Lægaard - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-12.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Individual Integrity, Freedom of Association and Religious Exemption.Peter Jones - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-15.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Religion and Discrimination: Extending the ‘Disaggregative Approach’.Daniel Sabbagh - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Contextualism in Normative Political Theory and the Problem of Critical Distance.Sune Lægaard - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (4):953-970.
    Political theory is contextualist when factual claims about context are part of the justification of normative political judgments. There are different kinds of contextualism depending on whether context is relevant for the formulation and justification of political principles, whether principles themselves are contextually specific, or whether context is only relevant for the application of principles. An important challenge to contextualism is the problem of critical distance: how can theories ensure a critical perspective if facts about the context to be evaluated (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Survey Article: Pluralist Neutrality.Collis Tahzib - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy 26 (4):508-532.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Deliberative Democracy, Diversity, and Restraint.James Boettcher - forthcoming - Res Publica:1-21.
    Public reason liberals disagree about the relationship between public justification and deliberative democracy. My goal is to argue against the recent suggestion that public reason liberals seek a ‘divorce’ from deliberative democracy. Defending this thesis will involve discussing the benefits of deliberation for public justification as well as revisiting public reason’s standard Rawlisan restraint requirement. I criticize Kevin Vallier’s alternative convergence-based principle of restraint and respond to the worry that the standard Rawlsian restraint requirement reduces the likelihood of public justification (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Understanding Religion, Governing Religion: A Realist Perspective.Enzo Rossi - 2017 - In Cecile Laborde & Aurelia Bardon (eds.), Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Cécile Laborde has argued that the freedom we think of as ‘freedom of religion’ should be understood as a bundle of separate and relatively independent freedoms. I criticise that approach by pointing out that it is insufficiently sensitive to facts about the sorts of entities that liberal states are. I argue that states have good reasons to mould phenomena such as religion into easily governable monoliths. If this is a problem from the normative point of view, it is not due (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Diversity, Toleration and Recent Social Contract Theory.James W. Boettcher - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (5):539-554.
    Ryan Muldoon has recently advanced an interesting and original bargaining model of the social contract as an alternative to Rawlsian social contract theory and political liberalism. This model is s...
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • In Defense of Moderate Inclusivism: Revisiting Rawls and Habermas on Religion in the Public Sphere.Jonas Jakobsen & Kjersti Fjørtoft - 2018 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 2:143-157.
    The paper discusses Rawls’ and Habermas’ theories of deliberative democracy, focusing on the question of religious reasons in political discourse. Whereas Rawls as well as Habermas defend a fully inclusivist position on the use of religious reasons in the ‘background culture’ or ‘informal public sphere’, we defend a moderately inclusivist position. Moderate inclusivism welcomes religiously inspired contributions to public debate, but it also makes normative demands on public argumentation beyond the ‘public forum’ or ‘formal public sphere’. In particular, moderate inclusivism (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Should Abraham Get a Religious Exemption?Andrei Bespalov - 2019 - Res Publica 25 (2):235-259.
    The standard liberal egalitarian approach to religious exemptions from generally applicable laws implies that such exemptions may be necessary in the name of equal respect for each citizen’s conscience. In each particular case this approach requires balancing the claims of devout believers against the countervailing claims of other citizens. I contend, firstly, that under the conditions of deep moral and ideological disagreement the balancing procedure proves to be extremely inconclusive. It does not provide an unequivocal solution even in the imaginary (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Should Liberal States Subsidize Religious Schooling?François Boucher - 2018 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 37 (6):595-613.
    Many liberals and secularists believe that religious schooling should not be publicly funded or that it should simply be banned. Challenging those views, I claim that although liberal states may refuse to fund and may even ban certain illiberal separate religious schools, it is impermissible, for distinctively liberal reasons, to completely ban publicly funded religious schooling. I will however argue that providing religious instruction within common public schools is more desirable than having separate religious schools. I argue that providing religious (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the Genealogy and Legitimacy of the Secular State: Böckenförde and the Asadians.Jean L. Cohen - 2018 - Constellations 25 (2):207-224.