Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hyperintensionality and Normativity.Federico L. G. Faroldi - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
    Presenting the first comprehensive, in-depth study of hyperintensionality, this book equips readers with the basic tools needed to appreciate some of current and future debates in the philosophy of language, semantics, and metaphysics. After introducing and explaining the major approaches to hyperintensionality found in the literature, the book tackles its systematic connections to normativity and offers some contributions to the current debates. The book offers undergraduate and graduate students an essential introduction to the topic, while also helping professionals in related (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories.Giovanni Sartor - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):217-251.
    I shall compare two views of legal concepts: as nodes in inferential nets and as categories in an ontology (a conceptual architecture). Firstly, I shall introduce the inferential approach, consider its implications, and distinguish the mere possession of an inferentially defined concept from the belief in the concept’s applicability, which also involves the acceptance of the concept’s constitutive inferences. For making this distinction, the inferential and eliminative analysis of legal concepts proposed by Alf Ross will be connected to the views (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The categorical imperative: Category theory as a foundation for deontic logic.Clayton Peterson - 2014 - Journal of Applied Logic 12 (4):417-461.
  • Stratification of normative systems with intermediaries.Lars Lindahl & Jan Odelstad - 2011 - Journal of Applied Logic 9 (2):113-136.
  • Normative positions within an algebraic approach to normative systems.Lars Lindahl & Jan Odelstad - 2004 - Journal of Applied Logic 2 (1):63-91.
  • Normative systems represented by boolean quasi-orderings.Jan Odelstad & Lars Lindahl - 2000 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):161-174.
  • Legal Power: The Basic Definition.Lars Lindahl & David Reidhav - 2017 - Ratio Juris 30 (2):158-185.
    The concept of legal power is important in the law since, with regard to actions having legal effect, the “exercise of legal power” delimits those actions for which manifestation of intention to achieve a legal effect is essential for the effect to ensue. The paper proposes a definition that captures this feature of legal power and marks it off from “direct effect,” as well as from permissibility and practical ability to achieve the legal effect. This analysis of power is limited (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Intermediaries and intervenients in normative systems.Lars Lindahl & Jan Odelstad - 2008 - Journal of Applied Logic 6 (2):229-250.
  • Deduction and Justification in the Law. The Role of Legal Terms and Concepts.Lars Lindahl - 2004 - Ratio Juris 17 (2):182-202.
    Legal terms, such as “ownership,”“contract,”“validity,”“negligence,” are used as middle terms in legal deduction. The paper distinguishes two problems regarding this use. One is the logical function of terms for deduction within a normative system. Specific problems dealt with in this connection are meaning, definition, and economy of expression. The other problem connected with middle terms is the “moulding” and possible manipulation of the meaning of legal terms, for arriving at desired conclusions in a given scheme of inference. It is indicated (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations