Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Rethinking Whewell.John Wettersten - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (4):481-515.
    The nineteenth-century appraisal of Whewell's philosophy as confused, eclectic, and metaphysical is still dominant today. Yet he keeps reappearing on the agenda of the historians and philosophers of science. Why? Whewell continues to be a puzzle. Historians evade the puzzle by deeming him to have had no serious philosophy but some interesting ideas and/or to have been socially important. Menachim Fisch's recent study offers promise of a new appraisal. But Fisch's account leads back to the puzzle. Fisch poses the question (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Generativist Versus Foundational Justification: A Reply to Andrew Lugg.Brian S. Baigrie - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (3):503-508.
  • William Whewell.Laura J. Snyder - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.