Switch to: References

Citations of:

Taxonomy, ontology, and natural kinds

Synthese 195 (4):1427-1439 (2018)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Emotions, Concepts and the Indeterminacy of Natural Kinds.Henry Taylor - forthcoming - Synthese.
    A central question for philosophical psychology is which mental faculties form natural kinds. There is hot debate over the kind status of faculties as diverse as consciousness, seeing, concepts, emotions, constancy and the senses. In this paper, I take emotions and concepts as my main focus, and argue that questions over the kind status of these faculties are complicated by the undeservedly overlooked fact that natural kinds are indeterminate in certain ways. I will show that indeterminacy issues have led to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • No Purely Epistemic Theory Can Account for the Naturalness of Kinds.Olivier Lemeire - forthcoming - Synthese:1-19.
    Several philosophers have recently tried to define natural kinds in epistemic terms only. Given the persistent problems with finding a successful metaphysical theory, these philosophers argue that we would do better to describe natural kinds solely in terms of their epistemic usefulness, such as their role in supporting inductive inferences. In this paper, I argue against these epistemology-only theories of natural kinds and in favor of, at least partly, metaphysical theories. I do so in three steps. In the first section (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cautious Realism and Middle Range Ontology.P. Magnus - 2018 - Metascience 27 (3):365-370.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark