Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Time Reversal.Bryan W. Roberts - forthcoming - In Eleanor Knox & Alistair Wilson (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics.
    This article deals with the question of what time reversal means. It begins with a presentation of the standard account of time reversal, with plenty of examples, followed by a popular non-standard account. I argue that, in spite of recent commentary to the contrary, the standard approach to the meaning of time reversal is the only one that is philosophically and physically viable. The article concludes with a few open research problems about time reversal.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ambiguities in Order-Theoretic Formulations of Thermodynamics.Robert Marsland Iii, Harvey R. Brown & Giovanni Valente - unknown
    Since the 1909 work of Carathéodory, formulations of thermodynamics have gained ground which highlight the role of the the binary relation of adiabatic accessibility between equilibrium states. A feature of Carathéodory's system is that the version therein of the second law contains an ambiguity about the nature of irreversible adiabatic processes, making it weaker than the traditional Kelvin-Planck statement of the law. This paper attempts first to clarify the nature of this ambiguity, by defining the arrow of time in thermodynamics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Arrow of Time in Physics.David Wallace - unknown
    I provide a self-contained introduction to the problem of the arrow of time in physics, concentrating on the irreversibility of dynamical processes as described in statistical mechanics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • A Revised Attack on Computational Ontology.Nir Fresco & Phillip J. Staines - 2014 - Minds and Machines 24 (1):101-122.
    There has been an ongoing conflict regarding whether reality is fundamentally digital or analogue. Recently, Floridi has argued that this dichotomy is misapplied. For any attempt to analyse noumenal reality independently of any level of abstraction at which the analysis is conducted is mistaken. In the pars destruens of this paper, we argue that Floridi does not establish that it is only levels of abstraction that are analogue or digital, rather than noumenal reality. In the pars construens of this paper, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations