Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Conception, Sense, and Reference in Peircean Semiotics.Risto Hilpinen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (4):1-28.
    In his Logical Investigations Edmund Husserl criticizes John Stuart Mill’s account of meaning as connotation, especially Mill’s failure to separate the distinction between connotative and non-connotative names from the distinction between the meaningful and the meaningless. According to Husserl, both connotative and non-connotative names have meaning or “signification”, that is, what Gottlob Frege calls the sense (“Sinn”) of an expression. The distinction between connotative and non-connotative names is a distinction between two kinds of meaning (or sense), attributive and non-attributive meaning (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On the Immediate and Dynamical Interpretants and Objects of Signs.Risto Hilpinen - 2019 - Semiotica 2019 (228):91-101.
    In his semiotic system Peirce distinguished between two interpretants and two objects of a sign: an immediate and a dynamical interpretant, and an immediate and a dynamical object. It is argued that Peirce’s immediate object can be interpreted a qua-object which has the dynamical object as its basis, and the dynamical interpretant consists of an interpreter’s conception of the object of the sign. Peirce semiotic system is compared with the accounts given by Frege, Husserl, Meinong, and the Stoics.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Cubist State of Mind: Meinong's Ontology.Albertazzi Liliana - 1996 - Axiomathes 7 (1-2):5-16.