Citations of work:

Colin McGinn (1979). Action and its Explanation.

9 found
Order:
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

  1.  17
    Reason, Irrationality and Akrasia (Weakness of the Will) in Buddhism: Reflections Upon Śāntideva's Arguments with Himself.Tom J. F. Tillemans - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (1):149-163.
    Let it be granted that Buddhism has, e.g., in its logical literature, detailed canons and explicit rules of right reason that, amongst other things, ban inconsistency as irrational. This is the normative dimension of how people should think according to many major Buddhist authors. But do important Buddhist writers ever recognize any interesting or substantive role for inconsistency and forms of irrationality in their account of how people actually do think and act? The article takes as its point of departure (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Reasons and Psychological Causes.Wayne A. Davis - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 122 (1):51 - 101.
    The causal theory of reasons holds that acting for a reason entails that the agents action was caused by his or her beliefs and desires. While Donald Davidson (1963) and others effectively silenced the first objections to the theory, a new round has emerged. The most important recent attack is presented by Jonathan Dancy in Practical Reality (2000) and subsequent work. This paper will defend the causal theory against Dancy and others, including Schueler (1995), Stoutland (1999, 2001), and Ginet (2002).Dancy (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  3. Psychoanalysis and the Personal/Sub-Personal Distinction.Sebastian Gardner - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):96-119.
    This paper attempts in the first instance to clarify the application of the personal/sub-personal distinction to psychoanalysis and to indicate how this issue is related to that of psychoanalysis" epistemology. It is argued that psychoanalysis may be regarded either as a form of personal psychology, or as a form of jointly personal and sub-personal psychology, but not as a form of sub-personal psychology. It is further argued that psychoanalysis indicates a problem with the personal/sub-personal distinction itself as understood by Dennett (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  25
    The Mechanics of Rationality.Mark Leon - 1990 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):343-366.
  5.  6
    Cognisance and Cognitive Science. Part Two: Towards an Empirical Psychology of Cognisance.James Russell - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):165-201.
    Abstract In the first part of this essay (Russell, 1988a) I argued that ?cognisance? (roughly: a subject's knowledge of his relation to the physical world as an experiencer of it) cannot be explained in terms of a syntactic theory of mind, due to the ?referential? and ?holistic? nature of this knowledge. The syntactic account of the higher mental functions is immediately intelligible to us due to its derivation from computer technology, so this would not appear to be a happy result (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  53
    Teleological Explanations and Their Relation to Causal Explanation in Psychology.Elizabeth Valentine - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):61-68.
    The relation of teleological to causal explanations in psychology is examined. Nagel's claim that they are logically equivalent is rejected. Two arguments for their non-equivalence are considered: (i) the impossibility of specifying initial conditions in the case of teleological explanations and (ii) the claim that different kinds of logic are involved. The view that causal explanations provide only necessary conditions whereas teleological explanations provide sufficient conditions is rejected: causal explanations can provide sufficient conditions, typically being unable to provide necessary ones, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  21
    Redundancy, Degeneracy and Deviance in Action.Berent Enc - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (3):353 - 374.
  8.  17
    On the Post-Wittgensteinian Critique of the Concept of Action in Sociology.Douglas V. Porpora - 1983 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13 (2):129–146.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  14
    On the Prospects for a Nomothetic Theory of Social Structure.Douglas V. Porpora - 1983 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13 (3):243–264.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations