Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Rawls on Liberty and Domination.M. Victoria Costa - 2009 - Res Publica 15 (4):397-413.
    One of the central elements of John Rawls’ argument in support of his two principles of justice is the intuitive normative ideal of citizens as free and equal. But taken in isolation, the claim that citizens are to be treated as free and equal is extremely indeterminate, and has virtually no clear implications for policy. In order to remedy this, the two principles of justice, together with the stipulation that citizens have basic interests in developing their moral capacities and pursuing (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Tyranny of the Enfranchised Majority? The Accountability of States to Their Non-Citizen Population.Meghan Benton - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (4):397-413.
    The debate between legal constitutionalists and critics of constitutional rights and judicial review is an old and lively one. While the protection of minorities is a pivotal aspect of this debate, the protection of disenfranchised minorities has received little attention. Policy-focused discussion—of the merits of the Human Rights Act in Britain for example—often cites protection of non-citizen migrants, but the philosophical debate does not. Non-citizen residents or ‘denizens’ therefore provide an interesting test case for the theory of rights as trumps (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Persons or Property – Freedom and the Legal Status of Animals.Andreas T. Schmidt - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (1):20-45.
    _ Source: _Page Count 26 Is freedom a plausible political value for animals? If so, does this imply that animals are owed legal personhood rights or can animals be free but remain human property? Drawing on different conceptions of freedom, I will argue that while positive freedom, libertarian self-ownership, and republican freedom are not plausible political values for animals, liberal ‘option-freedom’ is. However, because such option-freedom is in principle compatible with different legal statuses, animal freedom does not conceptually imply a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Insufficiency of Non-Domination.Patchen Markell - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (1):9-36.
    This essay argues that the neo-Roman republican principle of "non-domination," as developed in the recent work of Philip Pettit, cannot serve as a single overarching political ideal, because it responds to only one of two important dimensions of concern about human agency. Through critical engagements with several aspects of Pettit's work, ranging from his philosophical account of freedom as "discursive control" to his appropriation of the distinction between dominium and imperium, the essay argues that the idea of domination, which responds (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Sobre la estabilidad y fuerza categórica del republicanismo de Pettit.Martín Daguerre - 2010 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 33:147-170.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Exit Left: Markets and Mobility in Republican Thought.Robert S. Taylor - 2017 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Contemporary republicanism is characterized by three main ideas: free persons, who are not subject to the arbitrary power of others; free states, which try to protect their citizens from such power without exercising it themselves; and vigilant citizenship, as a means to limit states to their protective role. This book advances an economic model of such republicanism that is ideologically centre-left. It demands an exit-oriented state interventionism, one that would require an activist government to enhance competition and resource exit from (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Introduction: Domination, Migration and Non-Citizens.Iseult Honohan & Marit Hovdal-Moan - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):1-9.
    In Europe and other regions of the world public debate concerning how many immigrants should be admitted, which rights those admitted should have, and which conditions can be required for access to citizenship is intense and enduring, and these have increasingly become central electoral issues. On the one hand, the harsh treatment of migrants is often a matter of public criticism; on the other hand, states are concerned about problems of welfare, security and social unrest that they have come to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Nondomination and Normativity.Christopher Mcmahon - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):319-327.
  • Is Neo‐Republicanism Bad for Women?M. Victoria Costa - 2013 - Hypatia 28 (4):921-936.
    The republican revival in political philosophy, political theory, and legal theory has produced an impressive range of novel interpretations of the historical figures of the republican tradition. It has also given rise to a variety of contemporary neo-republican theories that build on its historical themes. Although there have been some feminist discussions of its historical representatives, neo-republicanism has not generated a great deal of enthusiasm among feminists. The present paper examines Phillip Pettit's theory of freedom as nondomination in order to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Non-Domination and the Ethics of Migration.Sarah Fine - 2014 - In Iseult Honohan & Marit Hovdal-Moan (eds.), Domination, Migration and Non-Citizens. Routledge. pp. 10-30.
  • Two Spheres of Domination: Republican Theory, Social Norms and the Insufficiency of Negative Freedom.Alan M. S. J. Coffee - 2015 - Contemporary Political Theory 14 (1):45-62.
    Republicans understand freedom as the guaranteed protection against any arbitrary use of coercive power. This freedom is exercised within a political community, and the concept of arbitrariness is defined with reference to the actual ideas of its citizens about what is in their shared interests. According to many current defenders of the republican model, this form of freedom is understood in strictly negative terms representing an absence of domination. I argue that this assumption is misguided. First, it is internally inconsistent. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Freedom as Non-Domination, Education and the Common Avowable Interests of Pupils: A Neo-Republican Critique of the Romanian Educational Legislation.Adelin-Costin Dumitru - 2018 - South African Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):34-52.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Determinacy of Republican Policy: A Reply to McMahon.Philip Pettit - 2006 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (3):275-283.
  • Non-Domination and the Ethics of Migration.Sarah Fine - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):10-30.
  • Self-Determination, Non-Domination, and Federalism.Jacob T. Levy - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (3):60-78.
  • Self-Determination, Non-Domination, and Federalism.Jacob T. Levy - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 60-78.
    This article summarizes the theory of federalism as non-domination Iris Marion Young began to develop in her final years, a theory of self-government that tried to recognize interconnectedness. Levy also poses an objection to that theory: non-domination cannot do the work Young needed of it, because it is a theory about the merits of decisions not about jurisdiction over them. The article concludes with an attempt to give Young the last word.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark