Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Drinking Water Quality in Indian Water Policies, Laws, and Courtrooms: Understanding the Intersections of Science and Law in Developing Countries.Aviram Sharma - 2017 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 37 (1):45-56.
    Drinking water quality has drawn enormous attention from scientific communities, the industrial sector, and the common public in several countries during the last couple of decades. The scholarship in science and technology studies somehow overlooked this crucial domain. This article attempts to contribute to this gray area by exploring how drinking water quality is understood in Indian water policies, laws, and courtrooms. The article argues that water policies and laws in India were significantly shaped by international treaties and global environmental (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A pragmatogony of factishes.Michael Lynch - 2001 - Metascience 10 (2):223-231.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Spectacular Showing: Houdini and the Wonder of Ethnomethodology.Eric Laurier - 2004 - Human Studies 27 (4):377-399.
    This essay is about Houdini’s escapes and ethnomethodology’s studies.1 By accomplishing what appears to be impossible, Houdini leaves his audience considering not only how did he manage to do that, but also just what is it that we consider to be possible. Magicians and escapologists warn us off an interest in the mechanics of their tricks that might spoil the thrill of what they dramatically present to us: a sense of the limits to whatwe can apprehend as an audience. While (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Public Proof in Courts and Jury Trials: Relevant for pTA Citizens' Juries?Serge Gutwirth & Mireille Hildebrandt - 2008 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 33 (5):582-604.
    This article explores the “fair trial” as a good practice for the construction of public proof. If proof signifies closure on matter at hand, and publicness is taken to signify both “access to” and “participation in” the construction of proof by the publics concerned, the authors contend that the “fair trial” is a good example of building public proof and that its backbone constraints can be of great interest to the defenders and advocates of participative Technology Assessment, especially citizens' juries.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation