Switch to: References

Citations of:

Randomness, Statistics and Emergence

University of Notre Dame Press (1970)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. An integral approach to health science and healthcare.Patrick Daly - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (1):15-40.
    Defining disease and delineating its boundaries is a contested area in contemporary philosophy of medicine. The leading naturalistic theory faces a new round of difficulties related to defining a normal environment alongside normal organismic functioning and to delineating a discrete boundary between risk factors and disease. Normative theories face ongoing and seemingly intractable difficulties related to value pluralism and the problematic relation between theory and practice. In this article, I argue for an integral—as opposed to a hybrid—philosophy of health based (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Implementing Generalized Empirical Method in Neuroscience by Functionally Ordering Tasks.Robert Henman - 2016 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 9 (1):10-21.
    This article outlines a method of collaboration that will manifest a high probability of cumulative and progressive results in science. The method will accomplish this through a division of labour grounded in the order of occurrence of human cognitional operations. The following article explores the possibility of a method known as functional specialization, distinct tasks presently operative in neuroscience. Functional specialization will enhance collaboration within a science as well as initiate implementation of generalized empirical method. Implementation of generalized empirical method (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Generalized Empirical Method: A Context for a Discussion of Language Usage in Neuroscience.Robert Henman - 2015 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 8 (1):1-10.
    This article extends a distinction between the data of sense and the data of consciousness discussed in a former article as a context for a discussion of language usage in neuroscientific literature. Such usage attributes mental acts to biological processes. In doing so, an unintentional neglect of the data of consciousness is perpetuated as well as a denial of the empirical nature of conscious acts or states. Such usage can also contribute to an inhibition of a more adequate understanding of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations