Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Logic or Rhetoric in Law?Alain Lempereur - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (3):283-297.
    One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reasoning. Does this reasoning belong to logic or to rhetoric? This debate, increasingly centered on rhetoric, is not merely a question of language use; it covers and indicates a more basic choice between formal legalism — focusing on rational deduction from the law — and pragmatic judiciarism — focusing on reasonable debate in the court.Today, it is necessary to circumscribe the respective fields (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Adaptation to Context.Charles Arthur Willard - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (1):91-107.
    Argument theorists often stress the idea of adaptation to context as an alternative to seeing argument as linked propositions. But adaptation is not a clear idea. It is in fact a complicated puzzle. Though many aspects of this puzzle are obscure, one clear conclusion is that the question-answer pair is not a good way to conceptualize adaptation to situation.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • An Application of Michel Meyer's Theory of Problematology to David Hume's Diaologues Concerning Natural Religion.James L. Golden - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (1):69-89.
    This study advances the claim that Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, which drew its inspiration and guidelines from Cicero's De Natura Deorum, fulfills four basic elements of Michel Meyer's theory of problematology. In doing so, it is argued, the Dialogues contribute importantly to our understanding of the question-answer pair, and to the notion of rhetoric as a way of knowing.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Apologie Pour les Faiseurs de Modèles.Jean-Baptiste Pointel - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (1):143-152.
    Dans son ouvrage Contre les « modèles » de justice constitutionnelle. Essai de critique méthodologique, Guillaume Tusseau décide de déconstruire et de combattre la traditionnelle dichotomie entre le soi-disant « modèle américain » et celui « européen » ou « kelsénien ». En effet, cette distinction est inutile voire contre-productive. Cet écrit est, pour l’auteur, l’occasion d’énoncer un projet comparatif, s’affranchissant des cadres antérieurs. Si sa démonstration est convaincante et fortement argumentée, une autre position théorique peut toutefois être embrassée. Sans (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark