Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: The Old Principal Principle Reconciled with the New.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):368–382.
    David Lewis (1980) proposed the Principal Principle (PP) and a “reformulation” which later on he called ‘OP’ (Old Principle). Reacting to his belief that these principles run into trouble, Lewis (1994) concluded that they should be replaced with the New Principle (NP). This conclusion left Lewis uneasy, because he thought that an inverse form of NP is “quite messy”, whereas an inverse form of OP, namely the simple and intuitive PP, is “the key to our concept of chance”. I argue (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Popper, Prior Probabilities, and Inductive Inference.Colin Howson - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (2):207-224.
  • Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: The Old Principal Principle Reconciled with the New.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):368-382.
    David Lewis proposed the Principal Principle and a “reformulation” which later on he called ‘OP’. Reacting to his belief that these principles run into trouble, Lewis concluded that they should be replaced with the New Principle. This conclusion left Lewis uneasy, because he thought that an inverse form of NP is “quite messy”, whereas an inverse form of OP, namely the simple and intuitive PP, is “the key to our concept of chance”. I argue that, even if OP should be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Doxastic Paradoxes Without Self-Reference.Robert C. Koons - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (2):168 – 177.
  • What's in a Numeral?David Miller - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 35 (4):323 - 344.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations