Switch to: References

Citations of:

Three Essays

Oxford University Press (1975)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Linguistic Authority and Convention in a Speech Act Analysis of Pornography.Nellie Wieland - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):435 – 456.
    Recently, several philosophers have recast feminist arguments against pornography in terms of Speech Act Theory. In particular, they have considered the ways in which the illocutionary force of pornographic speech serves to set the conventions of sexual discourse while simultaneously silencing the speech of women, especially during unwanted sexual encounters. Yet, this raises serious questions as to how pornographers could (i) be authorities in the language game of sex, and (ii) set the conventions for sexual discourse - questions which these (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Neutralidad Estatal, Libre Adhesión y Bienestar Crítico.Mariano Garreta Leclercq - 2005 - Análisis Filosófico 25 (2):165-199.
    En A Letter Concerning Toleration John Locke argumenta en favor de la tolerancia religiosa afirmando que el Estado no puede mejorar la vida de las personas forzándolas a vivir de acuerdo con creencias que ellas no suscriben. Más recientemente, Ronald Dworkin y Will Kymlicka han desarrollado argumentos similares. En el caso del primero, contra ciertas políticas paternalistas; en el del segundo, en apoyo de la tesis liberal de la neutralidad estatal. Mi propósito en el presente artículo es analizar la plausibilidad (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Between Autonomy and State Regulation: J.S. Mill's Elastic Paternalism: Raphael Cohen-Almagor.Raphael Cohen-Almagor - 2012 - Philosophy 87 (4):557-582.
    This paper analyses J.S. Mill's theory on the relationships between individual autonomy and State powers. It will be argued that there is a significant discrepancy between Mill's general liberal statements aimed to secure individual largest possible autonomy and the specific examples which provide the government with quite wide latitude for interference in the public and private spheres. The paper outlines the boundaries of government interference in the Millian theory. Subsequently it describes Mill's elastic paternalism designed to prevent people from inflicting (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Nietzsche's New Woman After a Century.Chairperson Carol Diethe & Carol Diethe - 1997 - The European Legacy 2 (2):271-276.
  • Autonomy and Paternalism: The Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz.Martin D. Farrell - 1991 - Ratio Juris 4 (1):52-60.
  • Nationalism, Individualism, and Capitalism: Reply to Greenfeld.Warren Breckman & Lars Trägårdh - 1996 - Critical Review 10 (3):389-407.
    Abstract Reversing the arguments of Anderson, Gellner, and Hobs?bawm, Liah Greenfeld contends that it is nationalism that produces economic development. Specifically, she claims that nationalism inspired three seminal economic thinkers: Marx, List, and Smith. However, Greenfeld's ideological preferences lead her to a problematic conception of individualism as nationalism, as well as to flawed treatments of Smith, List, and Marx. Nationalism is better understood as an attempt to address the deepening conflict between the imperative of community and the secular trends of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Autonomy and Autonomy Competencies: A Practical and Relational Approach.Kim Atkins - 2006 - Nursing Philosophy 7 (4):205-215.
  • Ecocentrism and Argumentative Competence: Roots of a Postmodern Argument Theory From the Brazilian Deforestation Debate. [REVIEW]Edward M. Panetta & Celeste M. Condit - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (1):203-223.
    This essay examines the Brazilian deforestation debate to explicate the beginnings of a post-modern theory of argumentation. Modernist argumentation reflects two distinct approaches, found in the deforestation controversy. The first approach, ‘universal minimilization,’ presumes that the survival of humanity is sufficient grounds upon which to base argument. The alternative, ‘strategic manipulation,’ results in argument being employed as a technical device to advance one's interest. In place of the modernist approach, we offer an ecocentric theory of argumentation. This conception calls for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation