Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Women in Early Human Cytogenetics: An Essay on a Gendered History of Chromosome Imaging.María Jesús Santesmases - 2020 - Perspectives on Science 28 (2):170-200.
    Alongside the renowned male pioneers of medical cytogenetics, many women participated in investigations at the laboratory bench and the bedside, both in Europe and the Americas. These women were committed to this new biological and clinical practice—cytogenetics, the origins of contemporary genetic diagnosis—and contributed to the creation of new biological concepts and settings centered on the study of chromosome imaging. This paper will review the contributions made by a group of woman scientists from a wide geographical distribution, situating their names (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The human autonomous karyotype and the origins of prenatal testing: Children, pregnant women and early Down's syndrome cytogenetics, Madrid 1962–1975.María Jesús Santesmases - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:142-153.
  • Tecnorituales del embarazo: Cuerpos de mujer en el origen de la genética medica.María Jesús Santesmases - forthcoming - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía:55.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Prenatal diagnosis: The irresistible rise of the ‘visible fetus’.Ilana Löwy - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47 (PB):290-299.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • A verisimilitudinarian analysis of the Linda paradox.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2012 - VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosphy of Science.
    The Linda paradox is a key topic in current debates on the rationality of human reasoning and its limitations. We present a novel analysis of this paradox, based on the notion of verisimilitude as studied in the philosophy of science. The comparison with an alternative analysis based on probabilistic confirmation suggests how to overcome some problems of our account by introducing an adequately defined notion of verisimilitudinarian confirmation.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark