Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 1. The Rationale for Ethics Review of Research by Committee.S. J. Edwards - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (4):147-150.
  • Protecting Boundaries of Consent in Clinical Research: Implications for Improvement.S. T. Bristol & R. W. Hicks - 2014 - Nursing Ethics 21 (1):16-27.
  • The Clinical Investigator as Fiduciary: Discarding a Misguided Idea.E. Haavi Morreim - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (3):586-598.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • The Law of Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Establishing Researchers' Duties.Susan M. Wolf, Jordan Paradise & Charlisse Caga-Anan - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):361-383.
    Research technologies can now produce so much information that there is signifcant potential for incidental fndings . These are fndings generated in research that are beyond the aims of the study. Current law and federal regulations ofer no direct guidance on how to deal with IFs in research, nor is there adequate professional or institutional guidance. We advocate a defned set of researcher duties based on law and ethics and recommend a pathway to be followed in handling IFs in research. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Research Versus Innovation: Real Differences.Haavi Morreim - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):42 – 43.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reviews in Medical Ethics.Ana S. Iltis - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):419-424.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Normative Justification for Distinguishing the Ethics of Clinical Research From the Ethics of Medical Care.Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (Fall 2005):566-74.
  • A Normative Justification for Distinguishing the Ethics of Clinical Research From the Ethics of Medical Care.Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (3):566-574.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Clinical Investigator as Fiduciary: Discarding a Misguided Idea.E. Haavi Morreim - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (3):586-598.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Reviews in Medical Ethics.Ana S. Iltis - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):419-424.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Realizing Informed Consent in Times of Controversy: Lessons From the SUPPORT Study.Robert J. Morse & Robin Fretwell Wilson - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (3):402-418.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • In Need of Remedy: US Policy for Compensating Injured Research Participants.E. R. Pike - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (3):182-185.
    There is an emerging ethical consensus that injured research participants should receive medical care and compensation for their research-related injuries. This consensus is premised on notions of beneficence, distributive justice, compensatory justice and reciprocity. In response, countries around the world have implemented no-fault compensation systems to ensure that research participants are adequately protected in the event of injury. The United States, the world's leading sponsor of research, has chosen instead to rely on its legal system to provide injured research participants (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations