Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Thinking Theologically About Reproductive and Genetic Enhancements: The Challenge.G. Khushf - 1999 - Christian Bioethics 5 (2):154-182.
    Current philosophical and legal bioethical reflection on reprogenetics provides little more than a rationalization of the interests of science. There are two reasons for this. First, bioethicists attempt to address ethical issues in a “language of precision” that characterizes science, and this works against analogical and narratological modes of discourse that have traditionally provided guidance for understanding human nature and purpose. Second, the current ethical and legal debate is framed by a public/private distinction that banishes robust norms to the private (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Embracing Change with All Four Arms: Post-Humanist Defense of Genetic Engineering.J. Hughes - 1996 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 6 (4):94-101.
    This paper sets out to defend human genetic engineering with a new bioethical approach, post-humanism, combined with a radical democratic political framework. Arguments for the restriction of human genetic engineering, and specifically germ-line enhancement, are reviewed. Arguments are divided into those which are fundamental matters of faith, or "bio-Luddite" arguments, and those which can be addressed through public policy, or "gene-angst" arguments.The four bio-Luddite concerns addressed are: Medicine Makes People Sick; There are Sacred Limits of the Natural Order; Technologies Always (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Altering Humans—The Case For and Against Human Gene Therapy.Nils Holtug - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (2):157-174.
    The case in favor of gene therapy is quite simple. Gene therapy is likely to improve the health and well-being of some people that are among the worst off in society, namely patients with painful and life-threatening diseases. However, two types of objection have been raised.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations