Citations of work:

Moshe Weintraub & Y. Michael Barilan (2001). Persuasion as Respect for Persons: An Alternative View of Autonomy and of the Limits of Discourse.

4 found
Order:
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

Search for work by author name and title
Add directly by record ID

  1.  6
    Doing Away with the Agential Bias: Agency and Patiency in Health Monitoring Applications.Nils-Frederic Wagner - forthcoming - Philosophy and Technology:1-20.
    Mobile health devices pose novel questions at the intersection of philosophy and technology. Many such applications not only collect sensitive data, but also aim at persuading users to change their lifestyle for the better. A major concern is that persuasion is paternalistic as it intentionally aims at changing the agent’s actions, chipping away at their autonomy. This worry roots in the philosophical conviction that perhaps the most salient feature of living autonomous lives is displayed via agency as opposed to patiency—our (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  12
    Informed Consent in the Ethics of Responsibility as Stated by Emmanuel Levinas.Javier Jiménez Benito & Sonia Ester Rodríguez García - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (3):443-453.
  3.  13
    Ethical Persuasion: The Rhetoric of Communication in Critical Care.Alex Dubov - 2015 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21 (3):496-502.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  37
    Respect for Personal Autonomy, Human Dignity, and the Problems of Self-Directedness and Botched Autonomy.Y. M. Barilan - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):496-515.
    This paper explores the value of respect for personal autonomy in relation to clearly immoral and irrational acts committed freely and intentionally by competent people. Following Berlin's distinction between two kinds of liberty and Darwall's two kinds of respect, it is argued that coercive suppression of nonautonomous, irrational, and self-harming acts of competent persons is offensive to their human dignity, but not disrespectful of personal autonomy. Irrational and immoral choices made by competent people may claim only the negative liberty to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations