Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A note on Etchemendy's and Prawitz's reduction principles for the Tarskian and model‐theoretic concept of consequence.Antonio Piccolomini D'Aragona - 2022 - Theoria 88 (5):1014-1036.
    One of Etchemendy's arguments against the Tarskian and model‐theoretic notion of logical truth is based on a reduction principle according to which a universally quantified sentence is true if, and only if, all of its instances are logically true. The reduction of logical truth to mere truth reveals that the concept of validity at play in Tarski and in model‐theory relies upon extra‐logical assumptions. A similar reduction had already been put forward by Prawitz, although not with focus on extra‐logical assumptions. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Logical Consequence.J. C. Beall, Greg Restall & Gil Sagi - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    A good argument is one whose conclusions follow from its premises; its conclusions are consequences of its premises. But in what sense do conclusions follow from premises? What is it for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises? Those questions, in many respects, are at the heart of logic (as a philosophical discipline). Consider the following argument: 1. If we charge high fees for university, only the rich will enroll. We charge high fees for university. Therefore, only the rich (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations