Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Wartenberg-Smith Film as Philosophy Debate: A Response to Diana Neiva.Murray Smith - 2019 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 11 (1):1-6.
    No categories
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Are There Definite Objections to Film as Philosophy? Metaphilosophical Considerations.Diana Neiva - 2019 - In Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven Gouveia (eds.), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. Nova Iorque, NY, Estados Unidos: pp. 116-134.
    The “film as philosophy” (FAP) hypothesis turned into a field if its own right during the 2000s, after S. Mulhall’s On Film (2001). In this work, Mulhall defended that some films philosophize for themselves. This caused controversy. Around the same time of On Film’s release, B. Russell published the article “The philosophical limits of film” (2000). This article had one of the first attacks against FAP, posing some main objections based on metaphilosophical grounds, which were called the “generality” and the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides.Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven Gouveia (eds.) - 2019 - New York: Routledge Press, Research on Aesthetics.
    This unique collection brings together internationally recognized scholars of film, philosophy, and the philosophy of perception and aesthetics, as well as many established philosophers working on the Film as Philosophy problem. It also includes several young scholars working currently in the philosophy and film genre. It is especially poised to be used in university undergraduate and graduate courses, but appeals to the larger, more general audience as well as to those working in these particular areas of specialization. Philosophy in motion...
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   6 citations