Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. ‘My Holocaust experience was great!’: Entitlements for participation in museum media.Chaim Noy - 2016 - Discourse and Communication 10 (3):274-290.
    This interdisciplinary study brings together research on audiences’ participation in the media, and an up-close exploration of communicative entitlement of and for such participation. Viewing visitor books as situated, public media, the study asks two related questions: how museums and institutions that employ this medium frame participation of ‘ordinary’ people in the public sphere, and how, in return, visitors variously articulate their participation. The article first examines the context in which visitor books mediate participation, and how museums frame them so (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Memory, media, and museum audience’s discourse of remembering.Chaim Noy - 2018 - Critical Discourse Studies 15 (1):19-38.
    ABSTRACTThis study joins a prolific line of critical research on collective memory in relation to museums as ‘sites of memory’. It takes the political relations between museums and memory as the background against which audience production of discourses of remembering is analyzed. Collective memory is approached not as a passive ‘retainer’ of information, but as sets of public mnemonic practices which transpire in specific material and semiotic settings. The analysis is comparative and takes place in two Jewish history museums in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Discourses of collective remembering: contestation, politics, affect.Tommaso M. Milani & John E. Richardson - 2023 - Critical Discourse Studies 20 (5):459-476.
    This article introduces the key issues and themes that the articles in the Special Issue aim to apply and develop in greater detail. First, we argue that the field of collective remembering can be conceived as a site of active contestation, rather than simply a means of communicating a historic past or our deontic position in relation to these pasts. Approaching collective remembering as a Lieu de Dispute allows us, in turn, to foreground three consequential dimensions of remembrance, which the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark