Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Is a Complete Biocognitive Account of Religion Feasible?Lluís Oviedo - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):103-126.
  • Moderately Massive Modularity.Peter Carruthers - 2003 - In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 67-89.
    This paper will sketch a model of the human mind according to which the mind’s structure is massively, but by no means wholly, modular. Modularity views in general will be motivated, elucidated, and defended, before the thesis of moderately massive modularity is explained and elaborated.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Evolution and Nursing.Trevor Hussey - 2002 - Nursing Philosophy 3 (3):240-251.
  • The “Evolutionary Argument” and the Metaphilosophy of Commonsense.Stephen J. Boulter - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):369-382.
    Recently in these pages it has been argued that a relatively straightforward version of an old argument based on evolutionary biology and psychology can be employed to support the view that innate ideas are a naturalistic source of metaphysical knowledge. While sympathetic to the view that the “evolutionary argument” is pregnant with philosophical implications, I show in this paper how it needs to be developed and deployed in order to avoid serious philosophical difficulties and unnecessary complications. I sketch a revised (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • On a Recent Naturalism Debate in Business Ethics – From a Philosophy Point of View.Kwok Tung Cheung - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):889-898.
    William C. Frederick proposes a naturalistic business ethics. Many commentators focus on the issues of naturalistic fallacy, deprivation of freedom of the will, and possibility of important and universal moral values in business ethics. I argue that an ethics being naturalistic is not a worry. The issue of deprivation of free will is irrelevant. Yet there are urgent questions regarding the possibility of important and universal moral values, which may prevent Frederick’s view from getting off the ground.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark