Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Rationality of Argumentation Aimed at Multiple Goals.Dima Mohammed - unknown
    In this paper, I critically examine the main accounts of goals in argumentative discourse, aiming to formulate an account that is suitable for the examination of public political arguments, where typically multiple legitimate goals are pursued simultaneously. Such arguments are viewed as contributions to what can be dialectically reconstructed as multiple simultaneous discussions, and are analysed as strategic manoeuvres that can under certain conditions be reasonable but may, if such conditions are violated, become fallacious.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Argumentation and Design Deliberation: A Mutual Relationship.Chrysi Rapanta & Carole Blair - unknown
    Design deliberation refers to the process of thoughtfully weighing options, before making a design decision. This process is strongly related to argumentation, not only because of the well-known relation between argumentation and deliberation, but also due to characteristics of the design process. However, no structural model of team design deliberation exists to guide designers’ practice. This paper checks the hypothesis of inter-dependence between argument structures and group decision-making struc-ture as expressed through prescribed deliberation stages.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Defeasibility From the Perspective of Informal Logic.Ralph H. Johnson - unknown
    The notions of defeasibility and defeasible reasoning have generated a great deal of interest in various research communities. Here I want to focus on their use in logic and argumentation studies. I will approach these topics from the perspective of an informal logician who finds himself struggling with some issues that surround the idea of and the deployment of the concept of defeasibility. My intention is to make those struggles as clear as I can.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Goals in Argumentation: A Proposal for the Analysis and Evaluation of Public Political Arguments.Dima Mohammed - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):221-245.
    In this paper, I review and compare major literature on goals in argumentation scholarship, aiming to answer the question of how to take the different goals of arguers into account when analysing and evaluating public political arguments. On the basis of the review, I suggest to differentiate between the different goals along two important distinctions: first, distinguish between goals which are intrinsic to argumentation and goals which are extrinsic to it and second distinguish between goals of the act of arguing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations