Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. واکاوی روش‌شناسی پیرس و بررسی سهم آن بر رویکردهـا و روش‌هـای پـژوهش.رضاعلی نوروزی & شهناز شهریاری نیسیانی - 2016 - حکمت معاصر 7 (2):45-68.
    چکیده در پژوهش حاضر با تحلیل محتوایی که از آثار موجود در رابطه با فلسفه چارلز ساندرس پیرس انجام شد، روش‌شناسی این فیلسوف آمریکایی و بررسی سهم آن بر رویکردها و روش‌های پژوهش مورد توجه قرار گرفت. این بررسی ضمن اینکه بیانگر ارتباط بیانات پیرس در حوزه روش، با فن خطابه نظری در منطق، مقولات سه‌گانه و انواع استدلال است، نشان می‌دهد که پیرس در فلسفه خود از سه روش پراگماتیک، دستیابی به مقولات فلسفی و روش‌های تثبیت عقیده سخن می‌گوید. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Peircean Theory, Psychosemiotics, and Education.Howard A. Smith - 2005 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (2):191–206.
    The main aim of this article is to describe central elements of, and the relationships among, three interrelated domains of inquiry. The first domain is Charles Peirce's semiotic theory which offers five concepts of special relevance to the other two domains: primary components of the triadic sign, including the object, representamen, and interpretant; the unceasing process of semiosis, or continuous growth of the developing sign; the three forms of inference, of which Peirce's notion of abduction is of special interest; the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Play Until the Whistle Blows: Sportsmanship as the Outcome of Thirdness.Tamba Nlandu - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 35 (1):73-89.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Pragmatic a Priori Knowledge: A Pragmatic Approach to the Nature and Object of What Can Be Known Independently of Experience.Lauri Järvilehto - 2011 - Jyväskylä University Printing House.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Abduction with Dialogical and Trialogical Means.Sami Paavola, Kai Hakkarainen & Matti Sintonen - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):137-150.
    In this paper we maintain that abductive inferential processes should be embedded to a more general outlook on human cognition. Abduction has clear a.nities to the so-called interrogative model of inquiry in which inquiry and reasoning are conceptualized as a dialogue. We think, in addition, that dialogicality must be broadened to a “trialogical” framework which means a threefold relationship with mediating artefacts where the inquirer, other inquirers , and the object of knowledge are inextricably bound up with each other in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Abducing Abduction.Torgeir Fylkesnes - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):179-187.
    My argument in this article is this: we need a shift of methodological focus, from the analyses of the results of creative processes, the subjects of creative processes, and justifying our theories by the use of examples to the analyses of the creative process using case-studies. The importance of the kind of method employed in abductive research has been underrated. Methods influence the validity of conclusions. I will mainly examine two different kinds of methodological focuses that in effect diverts attention (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Projectual Abduction.Giovanni Tuzet - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):151-160.
    Projectual abduction is the inference drawing the means to achieve an end. Planning a course of action is an inferential task and we claim that the relevant inference is abduction. We distinguish projectual abduction from epistemic abduction. While epistemic abduction aims to determine an explanatory relation, projectual abduction aims to determine a teleological relation. It is important to remind in any case that abduction does not stand by itself: as is true for epistemic abduction, projectual abduction has to be developed (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Multimodal Abduction: External Semiotic Anchors and Hybrid Representations.Lorenzo Magnani - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):107-136.
    Our brains make up a series of signs and are engaged in making or manifesting or reacting to a series of signs: through this semiotic activity they are at the same time engaged in “being minds” and so in thinking intelligently. An important effect of this semiotic activity of brains is a continuous process of “externalization of the mind” that exhibits a new cognitive perspective on the mechanisms underling the semiotic emergence of abductive processes of meaning formation. To illustrate this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation